To me they saied i should send it in. By mail

I Europe we can choose between Casio, HP and TI. Problem is: Calculators are build for schools, not for using them in real life. Real Calculator: enter Number -> Press sqrt -> read result. Modern gameboy calculator: enter sqrt use cursor to go to number field -> enter number -> press equal -> read result. May be nice to learn how schoolbooks are written, but very inconvinient if you have to use the calculator for real

Depends on the models pretty much, I used scientific models like FX 4500P, the 880P, the CFX-9850GB PLUS during my education, and they had programming modes where that isn't the case.

Maybe that has changed in the last decades.

In the US, we had math books that directly integrated lessons on using the TI calculator (exact function names, button icons, screenshots).

For me everything more than c with classes is too much cognitive load. Templates my by ok for implementing Generics but most of the other changes this comitee has produces are complete waste of brain i think

I did not understand what this is all about. Anyone with more brain than me can explain please?

It's a quick proof of concept of computer use powered by Jev, a new general-purpose classifier model. Here it takes the description of the interface (it can't do images yet) and outputs commands. It's faster and many times cheaper than using frontier generative models like GPT to do the same.

Jev docs gives a good explanation https://docs.typesafe.ai/concepts/system-one

Also see recent discussion https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49717558#49718350

Other distros are based of ununtu. Will the all ship with crippled coreutils from now on?

Linux Mint mentioned on their blog that they would be using the Rust versions.

I had exactly the same idea. I would give them even 9 bits to have headroom

No, a class-based OO language where you need to spend effort crafting build targets by hand or use an IDE to define how to build is not anything close to what I'm talking about. If you think that it's "Rust with GC", I think you're misunderstanding what actually appeals to most people about Rust.

I'd also argue that "runs on all OS" is true, but "is easy to develop without extra work in a cross-platform way" is not. I've never cloned a Rust project and had trouble building out of the box on Linux, but I'd estimate maybe one out of 20 C# projects I clone from Github build for me out of the box with `dotnet build`; the rest either require me manually tweaking the build configs to avoid stuff like hardcoded Windows-style paths or link to system dependencies that don't exist on Linux. I imagine you might argue that this is a property of how people use the language rather than the language itself, but that doesn't really matter from the standpoint of whether it's worth it for developers who don't use Windows to spend any time trying to invest in the ecosystem.

I remember an other 1 tier language ms once had. Anyone remember Visual-J? On the other hand if we could code in rust and get windows.forms as a ui it might make sense. MS is burning UI layer faster than one can train on

Why would an AI crawler do this?

> Attackers found and deliberately targeted URLs that resulted in cache misses, such as non-existent pages with unique paths (404s) as well as temporary redirects (302s)

There's no evidence the crawlers are AI-related.