Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | kyleee's commentslogin

Brazil should ban motorcycles; I see the craziest vids from Brazil of people on motorcycles robbing and killing people. Wild place

I mean to be honest, fuck them all. The whole affair is fruit of the poisoned tree (Zuck). Just because people are making bank working there doesn’t absolve them of responsibility for their choices. Each and every employee made that conscious choice to be a part of it all

With curry powder. So weird and delicious

I get what you are saying but still skip the airport sandwich (in America at least).

But to be fair, many of the conversations about sandwiches are quite fun and even poignant. So I can’t say I’m mad

I mean, unfortunately it resonates for me. Hah

Why won’t they put the rav4 hybrid engine the Tacoma and sell it to me?

It’s still rude, have you no shame?

This is what distributors do. I don't feel cheated when an Amazon sellers offers something that I can buy for 40% less direct from China, or when a store sells me a loaf of bread for $4 that they paid $2.75 for.

If it's worth it to me at the price offered, I'll buy it. If it's not, I won't.


amazon is a bad example for this because they aren't just saying here is x for y$. they force the sellers into paying at least y everywhere, even if amazon has nothing to do with the sale. they are using their semi-monopoly to raise your price on x everywhere. sort of the opposite of the "the market will solve it" approach.

My local Giant charges $1 more for identical butter than Lidl. What an outrage.

Was it a true statement though? You may need to explain what you were working on (heh)

These claudisms are usually "true" but they are so heavily load-bearing that you need a claude-to-english dictionary to understand it.

Like the sibling comment says, text is always "true" in the sense that it's reacting to context correctly. So yes, true, but insufferable.

Ironically, what I'm working on a post-processing hook for colorizing and summarizing responses without degrading the session quality. So "truncating" = summarizing, "quantizer" = char limits and thresholds, "collides" = conflicts, "two oranges" is referring to the "alert level colors" where a second model (Haiku/Sonnet) colorizes text based on the perceived (or suggested) priority of a response's statements (e.g. "just so you're aware, I didn't commit" is fucking useless and it needs to be blacked out).

So the original insufferable statement translates to something like "The code that checks whether a text fragment is too verbose was conflicting with the part that colorizes the text."

P.S. Let me know if there's something out there that exists like this- something that adds a dimension like color or priority-assessments on a per-response basis. So far all I've seen is 2 dozen ~100k starred GitHub plugins that add zero value or make things worse.


Yep, sounds like the Opus I despise and the reason I dropped Claude Code. It reads like it doesn't want to be understood.

Easy to solve with a colostomy bag

[flagged]


Why? Can you explain?

Rampant homosexuality

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: