Nerd sniping the hackernews/twitter crowd with "large scale transformer-based language model alternatives."
People don't want to believe something as unsatisfying as "Scaling up LLMs" can yield something as profound as AGI/be useful, and just hope that literally anything else can take their mindshare away, and this just happens to be the new rage. Along with clearly-not-frontier-level open source models, non-transformer based architectures, etc.
Beats me also - this feels unreliable, extremely niche, and over-hyped. I don't trust LLMs even when they explain their reasoning; the idea of trusting a black-box classifier like this seems insane.
In my company, and I think in most companies that are using AI at all, one of the first ways it got integrated is as a classifier, to tag orders based on feeding all their data into a prompt and asking for a structured output.
I think demand for tools that are more tailored for this type of integration is high. I don't really understand why Jev is supposed to get my company's decisions right more than an LLM, but regardless of the tech I think people are just excited about the possibility of iterating faster, more explainability, higher-level tools that are specifically created to help hone classifiers etc.
I think the point of Jev is to thread the needle of the gap between non-LLM classifiers and LLMs.
Classifiers like classical NNs require:
- annotated data, potentially a lot of it
- training
- inference
#2 and #3 aren’t a big deal if you have an ML engineer, but #1 will always be a potential headache no matter who you are. The tradeoff is that they could be quite fast, cheap, and you can get probabilities, not just classes.
With LLMs you get:
- zero shot classification (no dataset or training required)
- potentially can use third party model providers like OpenAI off the shelf. Don’t even need to host your own model.
The downside to LLMs is that they are comparatively slow and expensive to traditional classifiers. Historically they also were prone to hallucination or malformed responses, though not as much these days. You also can technically get log-probs back, but these aren’t equivalent to the classifier probabilities.
Jev gets you the zero-shot, zero-infra benefits of LLMs, while being closer to the speed and cost of traditional ML classifiers, as well as both classification and probability responses.
Yeah but they weren't that great, you couldn't ask for arbitrary classifications after the model was trained. You are underestimating what they've done here, even if it does seem a little overhyped.
I'm currently traveling but I'll post it tomorrow. That said, you could recreate it yourself by just cloning the Asahi repos and asking Astra to make it work on the M3. I followed along with Alyssa Rosenzweig's original series of articles and tried to reproduce the milestones that she did in the same order to sanity check the work. The whole thing took about a week.
I’m going to try getting it going with codex and Claude code this evening.
I’ve just found that having more cousin projects to be inspired by really helps llms. Plus, you never know what future project/agent may find a gem in your project to apply somewhere else.
Miguel de Icaza took that code and got it running on Mono back in the day, and a few months ago for kicks I compiled it and it still runs. Quite buggy though.
The industry standard VFX compositing tool Nuke also uses Tcl for its expressions and save format, it's all Tcl terms as I recall. My brother did VFX for a while and I was amused when he was having some trouble with an expression and I was like "it's a Tcl system... I know this" and helped him.
I swear "bifrost" has to be the most overused name in computing, possibly only behind "yggdrasil." I'm not sure what's so magnetic about those names but I've seen at least 10 different things called that.
I've been waiting over a year trying to get my wife into the country. Looks like I'll be waiting even longer now. The US immigration system is just so utterly cruel and broken.
> It is the opinion of the Board that Large Language Models (LLMs), herein referred to as Slop Generators, are unsuitable for use as software engineering tools, particularly in the Free and Open Source Software movement.
reply